there's no catchy tune to immediately glom onto. Mahler is largely unknown because the movements are too broad and sprawling. If Mozart's last few symphonies are popular with the general public it is in part because these few works with short, catchy tunes are frequently played. and Mahler is also irrelevant, Bruckner non-existent, and Vivaldi's Four Seasons, Pachelbel's Canon and Strauss Blue Danube are the greatest works of music of all time. because they virtaully composed nothing but opera. If you are citing the opinions of the general public then you must believe that Wagner and Verdi and Puccini are all irrelevant. The fact that the general public probably doesn't like opera is irrelevant for the simple reason that the opinions of the general public with regard to classical music are largely irrelevant. He composed seven major opera, with four towering works that stand among the greatest and most influential work in the genre. ![]() He is also far ahead the greater composer when it comes to opera and concert arias. Indeed, I would be hard-put to think of any other composer who might surpass him considering this body of work as a whole. ![]() Mozart clearly dominates when it comes to the piano concertos. It's just not something I return to very often. What was the point of the first three minutes apart from the sweep of the drums at the very beginning? The main melody that is introduced at the three minute mark dominates the rest of the movement, and in no way was this a set up for some "climax" a la the first movement of Mahler's 9th. Take Symphony 103 for example, first movement. My biggest problem with Haydn's symphonies is that sometimes they're incredibly repetitive and there's an incredible amount of "filler" - I often get the sense that they're really longer than Mahler's. Which ones would you say are Haydn's best apart from the London ones? And what are your favorite movements in the London symphonies? The last movement of the Jupiter is one of my favorite movements in any symphony, period. From the 35th symphony onward I'd take any Mozart over Haydn for for 40 and 41 it's not even close. Stream the album here.Can't decide since I've listened to only around 1/10 of Haydn's symphonies but with what I've listened to I'm leaning towards Mozart but my tendency towards privileging quality over quantity is more extreme than most. The orchestra sells Haydn’s joke with an effortless, split-second mood shift.Īll five volumes so far are filled with similar exceptional moments that bode well for what the next 14 years have in store. After a minute of pathos-filled drama, four bars of jolly dance music intrude. It’s one of a handful of Haydn symphonies in a minor key, and it begins with a brooding menace. The new, fifth volume in the series - a set of performances by the Basel Chamber Orchestra - feels urgent and vital, illustrating the subtleties and joys that abound in the symphonies. Antonini’s project, launched in 2014, calls for him to record about six symphonies per year for 18 years. That’s exactly what conductor Giovanni Antonini is doing with Haydn2032, a project to record all 107 of the composer’s symphonies by 2032 - the 300th anniversary of Haydn’s birth. So maybe we need to take a closer look at Haydn. Papa Haydn earned that nickname for both symphony and string quartet. ![]() His friend Mozart and his student Beethoven tend to soak up most of the spotlight, but neither of those guys is called the “father” of anything. (Photo: David Ellis/Decca) Conductor Giovanni Antoniniįranz Joseph Haydn never gets the attention he deserves.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |